AMÁLIA · The Three Hard Questions.

📊 Full opportunity report: AMÁLIA · The Three Hard Questions. on ThorstenMeyerAI.com — validation score, market gap, and execution plan.

TL;DR

Portugal launched AMÁLIA, a €5.5 million European Portuguese language model, which outperforms many benchmarks but prompts three hard questions about its openness, native data, and objectives. These questions have broader implications for Europe’s sovereign LLM efforts.

Portugal’s €5.5 million AMÁLIA language model is now operational, with the base version released in late September 2025, marking a significant step in the country’s AI development efforts. However, critical questions about its openness, native-language data, and strategic goals are emerging, raising broader concerns for Europe’s sovereign LLM initiatives.

AMÁLIA is a consortium project involving approximately 60 researchers from Portugal’s leading academic institutions, including NOVA, IST, and IT. It is built as a continuation of the EuroLLM multilingual foundation, rather than training from scratch, and handles Portuguese text only, with multimodal features planned for future updates. The model’s training involved 107 billion tokens, with a small portion (about 5.8 billion tokens) from Portugal’s web archive Arquivo.pt, representing roughly 5.5% of the total pre-training data.

Performance results show AMÁLIA surpasses previous open models on European Portuguese benchmarks and outperforms Qwen 3-8B on most Portuguese-specific tasks, though it still trails Qwen on ALBA, its primary benchmark. The final version is scheduled for release in June 2026, with ongoing development and evaluation.

AMÁLIA · The Three Hard Questions.
DISPATCH / MAY 2026 ESSAY · EUROPEAN SOVEREIGN LLMs · AMÁLIA · PT-PT
▲ Standalone Essay EU Sovereign AI · May 2026
Standalone Essay · European Sovereign AI · The AMÁLIA Case Study

AMÁLIA
The three hard
questions.

Portugal spent €5.5M to build a European Portuguese LLM. The base version is operational, the benchmarks beat Qwen 3-8B on most pt-PT tasks. So why are the most important questions still unanswered?

Last month, Duarte O.Carmo published the sharpest public analysis of AMÁLIA — Portugal’s state-funded European Portuguese large language model. He prefaces his critique with the necessary diplomatic apparatus before doing what almost nobody else in the European-sovereign-LLM discourse has been willing to do publicly: asking hard questions about whether the work, as released, actually does what it set out to do. This piece is a structural extension of his analysis. The AMÁLIA case study exposes three hard questions every national LLM effort needs to answer publicly — and the broader European sovereign-LLM movement has been operating without explicit answers to any of them.

▲ The structural editorial finding
The European sovereign-LLM movement is a real, important, underexamined structural phenomenon — and the public discourse around it is still treating individual model launches as the unit of analysis rather than the structural pattern they collectively form. €100M+ in publicly disclosed European funding deserves the discourse Duarte O.Carmo’s analysis models. The questions are real. They have answers. The answers determine whether the agenda succeeds.
— standalone essay · the AMÁLIA case study · may 2026
€5.5M
Portuguese government investment · December 2024 announcement
60 researchers across NOVA · IST · IT · FCT consortium · 450K academic users via IAedu
5.5%
Clearly pt-PT share of 107B extended pre-training tokens
5.8B Arquivo.pt tokens · EuroLLM base mixture pt-PT share not cleanly disclosed
Qwen>AMÁLIA
Qwen 3-8B still beats AMÁLIA on ALBA · team’s own pt-PT benchmark
AMÁLIA beats Qwen on most other pt-PT tasks · the structural paradox
Jun2026
Final version target · the strategic positioning moment
Base completed Sep 30 2025 · final June 2026 will determine structural answer
AMÁLIA €5.5M PORTUGUESE GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT · 60 RESEARCHERS · NOVA / IST / IT / FCT · BASE OPERATIONAL · FINAL JUNE 2026 Q1 · OPENNESS “FULLY OPEN SOURCE” CLAIM VS OLMO OPERATIONAL STANDARD · WEIGHTS / DATA / LOGS NOT YET PUBLIC Q2 · DATA 107B EXTENDED PRE-TRAINING · 5.8B CLEARLY pt-PT (5.5%) · QWEN 3-8B BEATS AMÁLIA ON ALBA Q3 · OPTIMIZATION LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE VS COUNTRY-KNOWLEDGE DEPTH · STRUCTURAL POSITIONING QUESTION EU LANDSCAPE ITALIAN MINERVA · GERMAN ALEPH ALPHA · FRENCH MISTRAL · OPENEUROLLM CONSORTIUM · SWISS APERTUS CLOSING THE EU SOVEREIGN AI AGENDA IS A SERIOUS PROJECT THAT DESERVES SERIOUS PUBLIC DISCOURSE · O.CARMO MODELS WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE AMÁLIA €5.5M · 60 RESEARCHERS · ~5.5% pt-PT IN MID-TRAINING · JUNE 2026 STRATEGIC MOMENT
The three hard questions · structural extension of O.Carmo

Three questions every national LLM effort needs to answer publicly.

Duarte O.Carmo’s framing maps cleanly onto the structural argument. Each question lands specifically in AMÁLIA — and the broader European sovereign-LLM movement has been operating without explicit answers to any of them.

The three hard questions · what AMÁLIA reveals about national LLM development
Each question is sourced from O.Carmo’s analysis. Each generalizes beyond AMÁLIA to every European sovereign-LLM project. The June 2026 final release is the moment several of these resolve — for AMÁLIA specifically and as precedent for the movement.
▲ Question 01 · Openness
How open is “fully open,” really?
FINDING: Technical report claims “fully open source.” As of mid-May 2026: weights, training data, training logs NOT public. Only Arquivo.pt processing scripts open.
The Olmo standard: weights + data + code + training logs all open. AMÁLIA currently sits closer to “open weights” (not even fully that yet) than “open source.” The European sovereign-LLM movement’s structural position depends on operational openness being real, not just marketing.
O.CARMO“Maybe it’s a matter of time. Maybe it’s research-in-progress.”
▲ Question 02 · Data
How much native-language data is enough?
FINDING: 5.8B pt-PT / 107B total = 5.5% in mid-training. SFT 17-18%. Qwen 3-8B still beats AMÁLIA on ALBA — the team’s own headline pt-PT benchmark.
The Minerva comparison: Italy trained from scratch on ~500B IT+EN tokens. Order of magnitude more native-language exposure. Continuation pre-training on multilingual foundation may not produce sufficient specialization to beat scale-advantaged general models on the very benchmark designed to favor specialization.
O.CARMO“How much more could we benefit from additional pre-training data in Portuguese?”
▲ Question 03 · Optimization
What should we be optimizing for?
FINDING: Benchmarks measure grammar / syntax / pt-PT/pt-BR bias / general knowledge in Portuguese. Missing dimension: does the model know more about Portugal than larger frontier models?
The strategic position: sovereign-LLM competitive structural position is not “match frontier on overall capability” but “exceed frontier on country-specific knowledge depth.” “What’s the most famous dessert in Aveiro? Who was president of Portugal 1978-1985?” Current benchmarks don’t measure this.
O.CARMO“A model smaller, but with much more intrinsic knowledge about Portugal.”

The three questions form a structural feedback loop. Q3 (optimization target) determines Q2 (data volume needed) which conditions Q1 (openness sufficient for community contribution). The European sovereign-LLM movement collectively benefits from these questions becoming standard methodology disclosure, not exceptional critique.

The data accounting · the empirical center of Question 02
Brazilian Portuguese Vocabulary 75 – Guided Language Learning Set with Audio | Ages 13+ | Essential Words & Sentences for Structured Study, Travel & Classroom Use

Brazilian Portuguese Vocabulary 75 – Guided Language Learning Set with Audio | Ages 13+ | Essential Words & Sentences for Structured Study, Travel & Classroom Use

FOR AGES 13 AND UP – TEEN & ADULT LANGUAGE LEARNERS Designed for learners ages 13+, this guided…

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

107 billion tokens. 5.8 billion clearly pt-PT.

The structurally tractable question with a structurally surprising answer. For a model whose entire stated purpose is European Portuguese prioritization, the native-language share of extended pre-training is 5.5%. The implications cascade into every other question.

AMÁLIA extended pre-training composition · token accounting
From the AMÁLIA technical report (Vieira et al., arXiv 2603.26511) and O.Carmo’s analysis. EuroLLM base mixture pt-PT share is not cleanly disclosed — that portion may contain additional Portuguese data of unclear pt-PT vs pt-BR composition.
Extended pre-training: 107B tokens total
5.8B clearly pt-PT · 5.5% From Arquivo.pt Portuguese national web archive. The only cleanly identified European Portuguese component of the AMÁLIA-specific training mixture.
101.2B EuroLLM base mixture · 94.5% Multilingual European foundation. Contains some Portuguese — but pt-PT vs pt-BR composition not cleanly disclosed. Methodologically the structurally important opacity.
▲ The Qwen 3-8B paradox · what it suggests structurally
Qwen 3-8B — Alibaba multilingual general-purpose model with no specific European Portuguese training emphasis — outperforms AMÁLIA on ALBA, the team’s own headline pt-PT benchmark. Scale advantage may compensate for specialization gap when specialization is only 5.5% of training mixture.
The openness comparison · the empirical center of Question 01
OUNEYTO AI Language Translator Device, 138+ Languages Supported, Magnetic Design,Easy to Carry, Portable Two-Way Real-Time Language Translator/Photo/AI Translator Devicefor Travel Business Learning

OUNEYTO AI Language Translator Device, 138+ Languages Supported, Magnetic Design,Easy to Carry, Portable Two-Way Real-Time Language Translator/Photo/AI Translator Devicefor Travel Business Learning

【140+ Languages Online Translation & Permanently free】 Break down language barriers with our language translator device. With support…

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Olmo standard. AMÁLIA’s current state.

Allen Institute for AI’s Olmo project defines what “fully open” operationally requires. Olmo doesn’t lead frontier benchmarks. That’s not the point. The point is to be the structural reference for openness. AMÁLIA’s “fully open source” claim should track to the operational standard.

What “fully open” means · five operational dimensions
The Olmo standard versus AMÁLIA current release status as of mid-May 2026. The June 2026 final release will determine which structural position AMÁLIA ultimately stakes — and sets precedent for every subsequent European national-LLM project.
▲ Dimension
▲ OLMO STANDARDAllen Institute for AI
▲ AMÁLIA CURRENTAs of mid-May 2026
Weights
✓ OPENPublic download · every checkpoint
✗ NOT YETNot publicly available
Training data
✓ OPENFull corpus inspectable
✗ NOT YETArquivo.pt-derived dataset not public
Training code
✓ OPENFull infrastructure
◐ PARTIALOnly Arquivo.pt processing scripts
Training logs
✓ OPENReproducible run analysis
✗ NOT YETNot publicly available
Methodology
✓ OPENOperational-level disclosure
◐ ACADEMICarXiv-report level, not operational
The fair reading: AMÁLIA is research-in-progress. Final version targets June 2026 — weights may release with that. The team likely has legitimate reasons (review, licensing, infrastructure) for current state. The structural critique is not “they’re hiding the weights.” It is that “fully open source” is a specific claim with specific operational meaning, and the movement collectively benefits from holding the claim to that standard. Olmo defines it. National LLM projects should match it.
The European sovereign-LLM landscape · strategic positioning
Amazon

AI training datasets for Portuguese

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Four strategic positions. AMÁLIA between two and three.

Approximately €100M+ in publicly disclosed European sovereign-LLM funding across the major initiatives. The structural question every project faces: what is the actual competitive position you’re staking? Four options — none mutually exclusive — but each requiring different commitments.

European sovereign-LLM landscape · four strategic positions
Italian Minerva, German Aleph Alpha, French Mistral, OpenEuroLLM consortium, Swiss Apertus, Italian Velvet, AI Sweden, Norwegian-LLM efforts, plus AMÁLIA. Each stakes a different combination of these positions. The competitive structural position is the one each project is willing to commit to operationally.
▲ POSITION 01 · GENERAL CAPABILITY
Match the frontier on overall benchmarks
The bet: European compute, European data, European talent can match US/Chinese frontier scale. Structurally hard — requires substantial compute and talent retention against US compensation packages.
PLAYERSOpenEuroLLM consortium · Mistral · partially Velvet · scale-investment dependent
▲ POSITION 02 · SOVEREIGNTY · OPENNESS
Exceed on compliance · data sovereignty · openness
The bet: European enterprises and governments will pay capability premium for sovereign deployment. Plausible but structurally fragile if capability gap grows beyond sovereignty premium can compensate.
PLAYERSAleph Alpha · OpenEuroLLM · AMÁLIA (partial via “fully open” claim) · regulatory-readiness dependent
▲ POSITION 03 · COUNTRY-KNOWLEDGE DEPTH
Exceed on cultural · historical · linguistic depth
The bet: “this model knows more about my country than frontier models do.” Structurally defensible — but requires country-specific knowledge benchmarks and training data investment current projects haven’t fully deployed.
PLAYERSMinerva (explicit, ~500B IT+EN from scratch) · AMÁLIA (partial via benchmarks, not yet via data) · O.Carmo’s argued direction
▲ POSITION 04 · APPLICATION SPECIALIZATION
Vertical depth in regulated industries
The bet: healthcare, legal, finance, government — country-specific specialization in regulated industries where sovereignty + capability combine. Probably most commercially viable but requires deep vertical integration.
PLAYERSMistral · Velvet (Almawave) · Aleph Alpha · commercial actors · vertical-integration dependent
▲ Where AMÁLIA actually positions · the unresolved question
Current AMÁLIA release sits between Positions 02 and 03 without clearly committing to either. Openness claim partially supports 02. Benchmark architecture partially supports 03. The June 2026 final release will be the strategic moment. Releasing as truly fully open with substantially more pt-PT training data and country-knowledge benchmarking stakes a clear 02+03 position.
Closing argument · what national LLM efforts should hold themselves to
HRH Spanish ESP Language Silicone Keyboard Cover Protector for MacBook Pro 13 inch 2020 (Model A2289 / A2251 / A2338 M1 Chip) and for Pro 16" 2019 (Model A2141),European Version

HRH Spanish ESP Language Silicone Keyboard Cover Protector for MacBook Pro 13 inch 2020 (Model A2289 / A2251 / A2338 M1 Chip) and for Pro 16" 2019 (Model A2141),European Version

1)【European Layout only】COMPATIBLE WITH: (1) Pro 13-Inch 2020 with M1 processor (model: A2338)(2) Pro 13-Inch Early 2020 released…

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Three standards. For AMÁLIA and the movement.

The structural critique generalizes beyond AMÁLIA. Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland, the OpenEuroLLM consortium, and every subsequent national project benefit from public discourse holding national LLM efforts to operational standards on openness, data accounting, and strategic positioning.

Three standards · what European sovereign-LLM efforts should adopt
Each standard generalizes from AMÁLIA to the movement. None is unreasonable. All are already met by some comparable project (Minerva, Olmo, Apertus). The argument is for these standards becoming norms across all European sovereign-LLM efforts.
01Openness
Hold “fully open source” claims to operational standards
Olmo defines the standard. National LLM projects claiming the same status should match the operational release, not just the marketing positioning. The European sovereign-LLM movement’s competitive position against US/Chinese frontier developers depends on the openness differentiator being real, not just marketed.
02Data
Publish complete native-language data accounting
“How much pt-PT is in this model” should be answerable from the public documentation. The norm exists in Minerva, Olmo, Apertus, and other comparable projects. National LLM projects should adopt clean data composition disclosure as standard methodology — not an exceptional ask.
03Target
Optimize explicitly for country-specific knowledge depth
The competitive structural position for sovereign LLMs is “this model knows more about my country than the frontier models do.” Building the benchmarks, training data, and evaluation infrastructure for that target requires explicit commitment. Linguistic competence is necessary but not sufficient; cultural-knowledge depth is the defensible position.

The European sovereign-AI agenda is a serious strategic project that deserves serious public discourse. O.Carmo’s analysis is what serious public discourse looks like. Appropriately diplomatic. Structurally rigorous. Willing to ask the hard questions in public when the public investment justifies it. More of this is needed — across every European sovereign-LLM project, not just AMÁLIA.

— Standalone Essay · The AMÁLIA case study · May 2026
Source dossier · the receipts
Colophon · Standalone Essay

Set in Source Serif 4 (display), EB Garamond (essay body), IBM Plex Sans & IBM Plex Mono. Standalone essay register · not part of the security franchise. Free to embed with attribution.

thorstenmeyerai.com

Standalone essay · European sovereign AI · the AMÁLIA case study · May 2026

€5.5M · 5.5% · Q3 unresolved · Jun 2026

Broader Implications for European Sovereign LLM Strategies

The development of AMÁLIA exemplifies Portugal’s strategic investment in native-language AI, reflecting a broader European push for sovereign LLMs. However, the project raises three critical questions about transparency, native data sufficiency, and strategic objectives, which are central to evaluating the success and direction of Europe’s AI sovereignty efforts. Addressing these questions is vital for shaping future policies and ensuring that national investments deliver meaningful, open, and strategically aligned models.

European Sovereign LLM Efforts and Structural Challenges

Across Europe, countries like Italy, Germany, France, and Norway are investing heavily in developing sovereign language models, often with public funds. These efforts typically involve either training models from scratch or extending multilingual foundations. The discourse has largely focused on technical benchmarks, but experts like Duarte O.Carmo have highlighted the need to scrutinize the underlying structural questions—particularly around openness, native data, and strategic goals—that remain largely unaddressed in public debates. Portugal’s AMÁLIA project is a key case study illustrating these issues, especially given its public funding and national scope.

“The three questions—how open is ‘fully open,’ how much native data is enough, and what should we optimize for—are fundamental to evaluating any sovereign LLM effort.”

— Duarte O.Carmo

Unanswered Questions About AMÁLIA’s Strategic and Technical Foundations

It remains unclear how open AMÁLIA truly is in terms of data and model access, whether the native Portuguese data used is sufficient for long-term performance, and what the strategic priorities are beyond benchmarking success. The final version’s development may address some gaps, but these issues are still under discussion and evaluation.

Next Milestones and Ongoing Evaluations for AMÁLIA

The final version of AMÁLIA is scheduled for release in June 2026, with ongoing assessments of its performance, openness, and strategic alignment. Researchers and policymakers will closely monitor how the model evolves, whether it addresses current gaps, and how it influences broader European sovereign LLM initiatives. Public discussions and transparency efforts are expected to deepen in the coming months.

Key Questions

What are the main concerns about AMÁLIA’s openness?

Experts question whether AMÁLIA’s data and model access are truly open, given the limited native Portuguese data used and the model’s restricted release scope.

Is the native Portuguese data sufficient for long-term performance?

It is still uncertain whether the approximately 5.8 billion tokens from Portuguese sources are enough for sustained, high-quality performance across diverse tasks.

What are the strategic goals of Portugal’s AMÁLIA project?

The official aim is to develop a high-performing Portuguese language model, but broader strategic questions about openness, data sovereignty, and AI policy remain under discussion.

How does AMÁLIA compare to other European sovereign models?

While AMÁLIA outperforms many benchmarks, its approach of building on a multilingual foundation contrasts with models trained from scratch, raising questions about long-term competitiveness and openness.

What is the significance of these questions for Europe’s AI future?

Addressing these structural questions is crucial for ensuring that Europe’s sovereign LLM efforts lead to transparent, capable, and strategically aligned AI systems.

Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com

This content is for general information only and is not financial, tax or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for decisions about your money.
You May Also Like

Private AI prompt workspace for sensitive teams

A new local-first AI prompt workspace designed for small regulated teams handling sensitive data is entering pilot testing, aiming to improve control and compliance.

Jack Clark Says It Out Loud — Reading the Co-Founder’s 60%/2028 Estimate on Automated AI R&D

Anthropic’s co-founder Jack Clark states a 60% probability that autonomous, self-improving AI systems could emerge by 2028, signaling significant policy implications.

The Continual Learning Research Map: Where the Memento Constraint Stands in May 2026

An overview of the current state of the Memento Constraint in AI research as of May 2026, including research directions, timelines, and remaining challenges.

Pentagon AI Goes Explicit: The Frontier Labs Move Inside the Classified Stack

The Pentagon has announced agreements with major AI firms to embed advanced AI models into classified networks, signaling a shift toward AI-first military operations.