🔍 Read the full analysis: The Stakes Of Nvidia Letting Jensen Huang Go on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
ThorstenMeyerAI.com published an opinion piece arguing that Nvidia would harm itself and the United States by letting Jensen Huang go. The article does not establish that Nvidia has decided to remove Huang or that he is leaving; the company’s plans and the circumstances behind the speculation remain unconfirmed in the supplied material.
ThorstenMeyerAI.com published an opinion piece on November 13, 2026, arguing that Nvidia would make a serious mistake by letting CEO Jensen Huang go. The article does not confirm that Huang has resigned, been dismissed or is preparing to leave: its central case is a warning about a possible scenario, not a verified change in Nvidia’s leadership.
Writer Thorsten Meyer says losing Huang would be damaging for Nvidia and for the United States, and compares the possibility to Apple’s decision to part with Steve Jobs. That comparison is Meyer’s interpretation, not a reported corporate decision or an independently established forecast of consequences. The piece also connects its argument to the wider importance of artificial intelligence, but provides no company statement or board announcement establishing a leadership change.
Meyer describes Huang as displaying kindness, humility and care in personal encounters. He also says that, over the years, more than a thousand people who know Huang have spoken positively about him to Meyer, including engineers, executives, colleagues and friends. Those are the writer’s accounts of private conversations; the article does not identify those people or provide independently verifiable records of their comments.
The article refers readers to related pieces about a purported resignation and questions involving Nvidia’s board, a spy investigation and former President Donald Trump. But the supplied text does not establish those developments as facts. Meyer says he has been quiet out of respect for Huang’s family and team during what he describes as a difficult family moment, without specifying the circumstances. He also says the article’s “What happened” box and animated timeline were researched and drafted with AI assistance, and that no company named in the article reviewed or sponsored it.
What happened · Nvidia, Nov 8 to Nov 12
From a board investigation to an interim CEO
The steps, in Nvidia’s own words and one attributed report.
- Nov 8Nvidia boardOpens an independent investigation “in light of recent reporting” that the CEO “has been the target of a foreign intelligence effort”; sees “no reason to believe” secrets were compromised
- Nov 11ReportedThe Wall Street Journal reports the board is preparing to oust Huang, according to CNBC. The same day, the board accepts his resignation, according to Nvidia’s 8-K
- Nov 12NvidiaAnnounces that Jensen Huang “has resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the Board, effective immediately”
- Nov 12New leadershipCFO Colette Kress is interim CEO and stays CFO; Harvey C. Jones becomes the board’s “first-ever Chair”; the search for a permanent CEO begins
Sources: Nvidia Newsroom, “Statement From NVIDIA Board of Directors” (Nov 8, 2026) and “NVIDIA Announces CEO Transition” (Nov 12, 2026); Nvidia Form 8-K, filed Nov 12, 2026 (SEC EDGAR); CNBC live updates, Nov 11, 2026, citing The Wall Street Journal.
Graphic: Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Why Nvidia Leadership Matters
Huang’s leadership is the subject of the warning, not a confirmed departure. The distinction matters because a verified CEO exit could affect Nvidia’s strategy and how employees, customers and investors assess the company’s future. The opinion piece, however, supplies no evidence that such a change is underway and does not quantify any potential business or market effect.
Meyer’s argument rests on his view of Huang’s character and on the importance of AI to the country’s future. Readers can understand that as a personal case for retaining the CEO, but it should not be mistaken for evidence about Nvidia’s succession plans, board deliberations or the likely performance of its business under different leadership. The article’s importance is therefore limited to the debate it raises, unless independently confirmed news emerges.
Products Worth Considering

Canon SELPHY CP1500 Wireless Compact Photo Printer Bundle with RP-108 Ink and Paper Set, White

Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 40 5K2K WUHD Curved LED Monitor (21:9)

FLEXISPOT Electric Adjustable Workbench, 48 x 30 in, Maple
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Opinion Actually Says
The piece is explicitly labeled “Opinion · My view” and dated November 13, 2026. Meyer calls Nvidia letting Huang go a mistake and compares it with Apple’s experience with Steve Jobs. He also says Huang is human and makes mistakes, while emphasizing what Meyer considers his exceptional treatment of others. These judgments and personal recollections are not presented as findings from a reported investigation.
Meyer addresses what he calls “spy talk” by describing Huang as a proud American. The article does not provide details establishing the nature or status of any investigation, nor does it show that such talk is connected to a decision about Huang’s role. Its mention of related coverage does not resolve those questions. The author discloses AI assistance in preparing some elements, says no named company reviewed or sponsored the article, and states that it is not investment advice.
“NVIDIA letting Jensen go is a huge mistake, for America and for humanity.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
No Verified Leadership Change
The supplied article does not confirm that Huang is leaving Nvidia. It contains no statement from Nvidia, Huang, the company’s board or another identified official that he has resigned, been dismissed or is facing a decision about his position. It also gives no timeline, succession plan or explanation of the family circumstances Meyer mentions.
The article’s references to a resignation, a board, a spy probe and Trump are not substantiated with details in the text provided. The status and significance of those matters therefore remain unclear, as does whether they are related to one another. Meyer’s accounts of conversations with people who know Huang are attributed to him, but those individuals are not named and their statements cannot be checked from the article.
Watch for Company Confirmation
The next meaningful development would be a direct, attributable statement from Nvidia or Huang about his role, or a formal company filing or board announcement. Until then, readers should treat the claim that Nvidia may let Huang go as an unverified premise discussed in an opinion piece, rather than as a confirmed corporate event.
Any further reporting on the related claims about a resignation, board activity or investigation would need to establish what happened, who is involved and when. The article provides no confirmed date for a decision or event to come. Its investment disclaimer is also relevant: Meyer says the piece is for information only and is not investment advice.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Key Questions
Has Nvidia confirmed that Jensen Huang is leaving?
No such confirmation appears in the supplied article. It argues against a possible departure but provides no statement from Nvidia or Huang that he is leaving.
What is the article’s main argument?
Thorsten Meyer argues that Nvidia would make a mistake by letting Huang go, citing his personal impressions of Huang and the broader importance of AI. This is the writer’s opinion, not a documented company decision.
What does the article establish about the spy probe?
The piece refers to “spy talk” but does not give details establishing an investigation’s status, evidence or connection to Huang’s role at Nvidia. Those points remain unclear.
Did Nvidia review or sponsor the opinion piece?
Meyer says no company named in the article reviewed or sponsored it. He also discloses AI assistance in preparing the “What happened” box and animated timeline.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
