TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Riga City Court sentenced Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, to six years in prison for financing an armed conflict, according to Meduza’s report citing Delfi. Investigators said a €43 transfer was intended to help buy electronic-warfare equipment for Russian forces; Kamleva told the court she had no criminal intent.
The Riga City Court sentenced Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, to six years in prison for financing an armed conflict, Meduza reported, citing Latvian outlet Delfi. Investigators said a €43 transfer was intended to help buy a mobile electronic-warfare system for Russian forces, while Kamleva denied that she meant to finance the Russian army.
According to investigators cited by Delfi, Kamleva agreed in a WhatsApp exchange in December 2024 to help raise money for military equipment. The request, they said, came from an acquaintance associated with Russia’s Kaskad military-patriotic center, who asked for assistance raising funds for a mobile system used for electronic warfare. The reported purpose of the equipment was to support Russian troops.
Investigators said Kamleva then contacted an acquaintance living in Belarus and asked him to send money on her behalf because transfers from Latvian banks to Russian banks were not possible. The acquaintance transferred 157 Belarusian rubles, equivalent to about €43, from his personal account. Latvia’s State Security Service detained Kamleva in December 2025, according to the report.
In her final statement to the court, Kamleva said she had not intended to finance the Russian army. She argued that messages found on her phone did not clearly show that the money was meant for Russian forces. Delfi had reported at the time of her detention that she was a member of the Latvian Russian Union Party and described her as a pro-Russian activist. Prosecutors sought an eight-year prison term; the court imposed six years.
A Small Transfer, a Serious Charge
The case concerns a payment of about €43 that investigators said was intended to help obtain equipment for Russian troops. Kamleva denied that she intended to finance the Russian army. The court sentenced her to six years for financing an armed conflict.
The sentence was shorter than the eight years sought by prosecutors. Latvia’s criminal code provides for up to 10 years in prison for financing an armed conflict, according to the source report. The available account does not include the full judgment or detailed reasoning from the court.
The reported allegations concern the specific messages, request and payment attributed to Kamleva’s case. The source account does not establish how the ruling may apply to other transfers or cases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Investigators Traced the Payment
The reported sequence began with a request in December 2024. Investigators said Kamleva was asked to help raise money for a mobile electronic-warfare system and arranged for a Belarus-based acquaintance to make the payment. Their account links the transfer to a difficulty moving money directly from Latvia to Russia.
The State Security Service detained Kamleva in December 2025, about a year after the reported messages. Delfi said she was a Latvian Russian Union Party member. The information available in the source does not detail what evidence beyond the phone messages and transfer records was presented at trial, or the court’s full assessment of that evidence.
Latvian law sets a maximum prison term of 10 years for financing an armed conflict, according to Meduza’s report. Prosecutors asked the court to impose eight years. The court sentenced Kamleva to six; the source does not provide an explanation for the difference between the requested and imposed terms.
“Prosecutors sought an eight-year prison sentence.”
— Prosecutors, as reported by Delfi
portable electronic warfare device
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Appeal and Court Reasoning Unreported
The source account does not say whether Kamleva plans to appeal the sentence, whether the judgment is final, or when the court issued its decision. It also does not include the full written ruling, which would clarify how judges assessed the messages, the payment and Kamleva’s argument that she lacked criminal intent.
The reported account attributes the alleged purpose of the transfer to investigators and describes Kamleva’s denial. The available material does not provide a full evidentiary record or a detailed response from her defense beyond her statement to the court. It is therefore not possible from this report alone to assess the court’s complete reasoning or the evidence supporting each element of the charge.
electronic jamming equipment for military
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Any Appeal Could Change the Timeline
The source report does not state whether Kamleva challenges the six-year sentence or identify a deadline for an appeal. If an appeal proceeds, further court proceedings could clarify the legal reasoning and whether the sentence is upheld, changed or overturned.
The reported development is the sentence described by Meduza citing Delfi, alongside the allegations and Kamleva’s denial. Details about the judgment’s final status, the court’s full findings and any appeal remain unavailable in the source material.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Who was sentenced by the Latvian court?
The Riga City Court sentenced Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, according to Meduza’s report citing Delfi.
What was the transfer for, according to investigators?
Investigators said the 157 Belarusian ruble payment, about €43, was intended to help buy a mobile electronic-warfare system for Russian forces. Kamleva denied intending to finance the Russian army.
How long is the prison sentence?
Kamleva was sentenced to six years in prison. Prosecutors had sought eight years, while the reported maximum under Latvia’s criminal code for financing an armed conflict is 10 years.
Has Kamleva appealed?
The source report does not say whether she has appealed or whether the judgment is final. Her appeal status remains unclear.
What did Kamleva say in court?
She said she had not intended to finance the Russian army and argued that the messages found on her phone did not clearly establish that purpose. She said she had acted wrongly but denied having criminal intent.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
